Of all of President Trump’s former associates who’ve come beneath scrutiny within the particular counsel’s Russia investigation, his former private lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, has undertaken maybe probably the most shocking and dangerous authorized technique.
Mr. Cohen has twice pleaded responsible in federal court docket in Manhattan to a litany of crimes, and he has volunteered info to the particular counsel and different businesses investigating Mr. Trump and his internal circle. He did all this with out first acquiring a standard, ironclad deal beneath which the federal government would commit to looking for leniency on Mr. Cohen’s behalf when he’s sentenced on Dec. 12.
Mr. Cohen has concluded that his life has been totally destroyed by his relationship with Mr. Trump and his personal actions, and to start anew he wanted to velocity up the authorized course of by rapidly confessing his crimes and serving any sentence he receives, in accordance to his associates and associates, and evaluation of paperwork within the case.
He has advised associates that he’s mystified that he’s taking the autumn for actions he carried out on behalf of Mr. Trump, who stays unscathed. Still, he’s resigned to accepting duty.
“He realizes that he needs to move on with his life, and that he’d like to begin that process as soon as possible,” stated Andrew W. Albstein, a lawyer and pal who wrote a letter of assist on Mr. Cohen’s behalf to the choose.
Mr. Cohen, who as soon as stated he would “take a bullet” for Mr. Trump, was for years Mr. Trump’s do-it-all fixer who had a hand in several shady deals. He has admitted he lied to Congress to help Mr. Trump and broke campaign finance laws by helping to arrange hush money for women who might have embarrassed Mr. Trump with accusations of infidelity as he was running for president.
He has not explained his legal approach since he first pleaded guilty in August. But his lawyers, in a sentencing memorandum filed late Friday night, offered the fullest explanation yet for Mr. Cohen’s motivation in switching sides and joining the government team, as prosecutors like to say.
Though he has talked extensively with prosecutors, it remains unclear if Mr. Cohen possesses any information that could harm the president legally.
Mr. Cohen’s approach drew a stinging reaction from Mr. Trump, who tweeted angrily on Monday that Mr. Cohen had “lied for this outcome and should, in my opinion, serve a full and complete sentence.”
Mr. Cohen served as Mr. Trump’s loyal ally and go-to lawyer for more than a decade, handling everything from real estate negotiations to hush money payments. He has been trapped at the center of a confusing legal web, involving two separate federal investigations, headed by different prosecutors, delving into different matters.
Investigators have dug into virtually everything, including the way Mr. Cohen ran his taxi business, how he bought the silence of two women claiming affairs with Mr. Trump and whether he had information about possible contact between Mr. Trump’s campaign and Russian operatives during the 2016 election.
Mr. Cohen’s commitment to Mr. Trump began to wane after a highly publicized F.B.I. raid on his home, office and hotel room in April. Last July, he told George Stephanopoulos of ABC News he was seeking “resolution.” Asked if he would provide prosecutors information about Mr. Trump in return for leniency, Mr. Cohen replied, “I put family and country first.”
“To be crystal clear, my wife, my daughter and my son and this country — this country — have my first loyalty,” Mr. Stephanopoulos quoted Mr. Cohen saying.
Just over a month later, on Aug. 21, Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty in Manhattan to eight felonies — including campaign finance violations, tax evasion and making false statements to a bank — before Judge William H. Pauley III. The federal sentencing guidelines call for about four to five years on those charges, which were brought by the United States attorney’s office in Manhattan, known as the Southern District.
Surprisingly, Mr. Cohen entered his plea without a traditional cooperation deal in which the Southern District would write to the judge and seek leniency when he was finally sentenced.
Cooperating witnesses are often not sentenced until investigations are completed, months or even years later. Mr. Cohen was concerned that signing a deal would delay his sentencing, his lawyers explained in their filing on Friday.
“He respectfully declined to pursue conventional cooperation so that his sentencing proceeding would go forward as scheduled,” wrote the lawyers, Guy Petrillo and Amy Lester, both former Southern District prosecutors.
They said that he expected to continue to cooperate. Ever since the F.B.I.’s highly publicized raids in April, the lawyers wrote, “nearly every professional and commercial relationship that he enjoyed, and a number of longstanding friendships, have vanished.”
“Thus, the necessity, at age 52, to begin his life virtually anew, including developing new means to support his family, convinced Michael to seek an early sentence date, fully understanding that this court will determine the timing under which his efforts to rebuild will commence,” the memorandum said.
As one of Mr. Trump’s confidants, Mr. Cohen was also a target in the inquiry by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, who has been investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and potential ties to Mr. Trump’s campaign.
Mr. Cohen’s lawyers said that their client began meeting with Mr. Mueller’s prosecutors as early as Aug. 7, even before his first guilty plea in New York. He ultimately met with the special counsel’s office seven times through November.
Mr. Cohen has also met twice with the Southern District prosecutors in Manhattan, as well as New York’s attorney general and state tax agency officials.
Last Thursday, Mr. Cohen entered his second guilty plea in Manhattan, this time to a charge of making false statements, which was filed by Mr. Mueller’s office. In court, he admitted he had misled congressional committees about negotiations he carried out on Mr. Trump’s behalf during the 2016 election campaign on a proposed tower in Moscow. Those negotiations, he said, lasted until five months before the election, far longer than previously known, and Mr. Trump was kept in the loop.
For lying to Congress, Mr. Cohen faces a potential sentence of up to six months under the federal guidelines. And although there was no traditional cooperation deal, Mr. Mueller’s prosecutors agreed to bring Mr. Cohen’s assistance to the attention of the sentencing judge.
Mr. Mueller agreed to file the false-statements charges in New York, where Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty before a randomly assigned judge, Andrew L. Carter Jr. But Mr. Petrillo then asked that the case be transferred to Judge Pauley “for purposes of sentencing,” and the government had no objection.
Now, as Judge Pauley considers how severe a sentence to impose on Mr. Cohen in both cases, he will be able to weigh Mr. Cohen’s cooperation with the Russia investigation. The Southern District is expected to join with Mr. Mueller in making that presentation, the plea agreement states.
Rebecca Roiphe, a professor at New York Law School, called Mr. Cohen’s maneuver “an unusual and creative way to get what he wants out of a situation that’s unorthodox.”
Another legal expert, William J. Harrington, a former Southern District corruption prosecutor who is now in private practice, said, “Tying it up in a bow gives Cohen the best chance at getting significant credit for his cooperation — and a good sentence.”