Federal prosecutors mentioned on Friday that President Trump directed unlawful funds to keep at bay a possible intercourse scandal that threatened his probabilities of profitable the White House in 2016, placing the burden of the Justice Department behind accusations beforehand made by his former lawyer.
The lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, had mentioned that because the election neared, Mr. Trump directed funds to 2 girls who claimed that they had affairs with Mr. Trump. But in a brand new memo arguing for a jail time period for Mr. Cohen, prosecutors in Manhattan mentioned he “acted in coordination and at the direction of” an unnamed particular person, clearly referring to Mr. Trump.
In one other submitting, prosecutors for the particular counsel investigating Russia’s 2016 election interference mentioned an unnamed Russian supplied Mr. Cohen “government level” synergy between Russia and Mr. Trump’s marketing campaign in November 2015. That was months sooner than different approaches detailed in indictments secured by prosecutors.
And in a separate case on Friday, the particular counsel accused Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s marketing campaign chairman, of mendacity about his contacts with a person they accuse of ties to Russian intelligence, and about his interactions with Trump administration officers after he was indicted on prison prices.
Together, the filings laid naked essentially the most direct proof so far linking Mr. Trump to doubtlessly prison conduct, and added to an already substantial case that Russia was looking for to sway the 2016 election in his favor.
Mr. Trump sought on Friday to dismiss the information, claiming it “Totally clears the President. Thank you!”
The White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, was less unequivocal. “The government’s filings in Mr. Cohen’s case tell us nothing of value that wasn’t already known,” she said in a statement. “Mr. Cohen has repeatedly lied and as the prosecution has pointed out to the court, Mr. Cohen is no hero.”
She tried to distance Mr. Trump from the accusations against Mr. Manafort, who was convicted on financial fraud and conspiracy charges unrelated to his work for the Trump campaign. President Trump has repeatedly defended Mr. Manafort as a “brave man” and dangled the possibility of a pardon for his 10 felonies, likely to result in a prison term of at least 10 years.
The revelations came in multiple filings by federal prosecutors for the Southern District of New York and by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III. Their work has intersected because both teams have charged Mr. Cohen with crimes, and he had sought to cooperate with both.
The prosecutors in New York mounted a scathing attack on Mr. Cohen’s character. They rejected his plea to avoid a prison term, saying that he had “repeatedly used his power and influence for deceptive ends.”
They argued that he deserved a “substantial” prison term that, giving him some credit for his cooperation, could amount to just under four years. “His offenses strike at several pillars of our society and system of government: the payment of taxes; transparent and fair elections; and truthfulness before government and in business,” they wrote.
Mr. Cohen, 52, is to be sentenced next week for campaign finance violations, financial crimes and lying to Congress about the extent of Mr. Trump’s business dealings in Russia.
Mr. Cohen’s crimes marked “a pattern of deception that permeated his professional life,” the Manhattan prosecutors wrote, saying that he did not deserve much leniency in exchange for his cooperation.
“The sentence imposed should reflect the seriousness of Cohen’s brazen violations of the election laws and attempt to counter the public cynicism that may arise when individuals like Cohen act as if the political process belongs to the rich and powerful,” they said, adding that he “sought to influence the election from the shadows.”
They emphasized that Mr. Cohen had implicated the president in payments to two women during the campaign to conceal affairs that they said they had with Mr. Trump. “Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1,” the prosecutors wrote. “Individual-1” is how Mr. Trump is referred to in the document.
The prosecutors have said that a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, a pornographic film actress, violated campaign finance law prohibitions against donations of more than $2,700 in a general election. A $150,000 payment by American Media Inc. to silence Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model, constituted an illegal corporate donation to Mr. Trump’s campaign, the prosecutors said.
The special counsel’s prosecutors offered a somewhat more positive view of Mr. Cohen than the New York team, saying he went “to significant lengths to assist” their inquiry, including by providing relevant information he had learned from Trump Organization executives during the campaign.
Over seven meetings with the special counsel’s office, prosecutors said Mr. Cohen had revealed details about an interaction that appeared to be the earliest known contact between a Russian offering to help Mr. Trump’s campaign. The timing of the interaction matched one disclosed earlier this year by BuzzFeed.
In November 2015, as discussions about a possible Moscow hotel that would bear Mr. Trump’s name were gaining momentum, Mr. Cohen told prosecutors he was approached by a Russian claiming to be a “‘trusted person’ in the Russian Federation.” The individual, who was not named, offered “synergy on a government level” with the Trump campaign and pushed for a meeting between Mr. Trump and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia that could have a “phenomenal” effect both politically and commercially.
Mr. Cohen, who told the special counsel’s team that he never followed up on the invitation, also “provided information about attempts by other Russian nationals to reach the campaign,” the prosecutors said.
He also revealed that Mr. Trump had been more involved in discussions over a potential deal to build a tower in Moscow than was previously known. Although he testified to Congress that negotiations ended in January 2016, before the first Republican presidential primary, he told prosecutors that those discussions had continued until June of that year, just before Mr. Trump won the Republican nomination and only five months before the election.
Mr. Cohen described to prosecutors his interactions with Russian officials who might have tried to use the project as leverage over Mr. Trump when he was running for president.
Before he testified falsely to Congress about the Moscow hotel project, Mr. Cohen has admitted, he consulted with White House staff members and Mr. Trump’s legal team. The prosecutors characterized his information about his contacts with people tied to the White House over the past two years as “relevant and useful information.”
Mr. Cohen has said he lied out of loyalty to Mr. Trump and to be consistent with the president’s “political messaging.” His lawyers, Guy Petrillo and Amy Lester, have asked Judge William H. Pauley III to allow Mr. Cohen to avoid a prison sentence, saying he cooperated with prosecutors even though he never signed a formal agreement.
They portrayed him as a remorseful man whose life had been shattered by his relationship with Mr. Trump, who has lost friends and associates and who wanted to come clean so he could begin his life anew.
Under federal guidelines, Mr. Cohen faces about four to five years in the Manhattan case, and up to six months in Mr. Mueller’s case. The special counsel suggested that any prison terms be served concurrently. But the guidelines are not binding, and Judge Pauley will decide his punishment.
Mr. Trump has accused Mr. Cohen of lying to prosecutors in hope of a lighter sentence. On Friday, he kept up his continuing effort to undermine public trust in the special counsel’s office and in the Justice Department. In a series of Twitter messages, he derided Mr. Mueller as a friend of James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director who said the president fired him in May 2017 after demanding “loyalty.”
Asked why the president was so upset about the special counsel, Roger J. Stone Jr., a fellow critic of Mr. Mueller, said it had dawned on Mr. Trump that the inquiry was not going away, his lawyers’ promises notwithstanding. “He has finally figured out that this is about him,” he said.
Spurred on by the White House, House Republican lawmakers used their last days in control of the chamber’s majority to press Mr. Comey Friday on what they claim is a pattern of abuse of power by the F.B.I. Mr. Comey reluctantly agreed to testify behind closed doors before two House committees — Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform — after they agreed to release a public transcript of his testimony.
Lawmakers emerged frustrated that Mr. Comey had not been allowed to answer questions about classified matters involving the Mueller investigation, in which he is a central witness. Mr. Trump took up their complaints, tweeting that Justice Department lawyers had demonstrated “total bias and corruption at the highest levels of previous Administration.”
Emerging after six hours of questioning, Mr. Comey defended the F.B.I.’s actions in the Russia case, and accused Republicans of a misguided preoccupation with the bureau’s handling its 2016 inquiry into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.