/Distorted Videos of Nancy Pelosi Spread on Facebook and Twitter, Helped by Trump

Distorted Videos of Nancy Pelosi Spread on Facebook and Twitter, Helped by Trump

Manipulated movies of Speaker Nancy Pelosi that made it appear as if she had been stumbling over and slurring her phrases continued to unfold throughout social media on Friday, fueled by President Trump’s feud with the Democratic chief.

One of the movies, which confirmed Ms. Pelosi talking at a convention this week, seemed to be slowed all the way down to make her speech sound regularly garbled.

The video has been seen tens of millions of occasions on Facebook and was amplified by the president’s private lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, who shared the video Thursday night time on Twitter. “What is wrong with Nancy Pelosi?” Mr. Giuliani mentioned in a tweet that has since been deleted. “Her speech pattern is bizarre.”

Mr. Trump himself tweeted a separate video of Ms. Pelosi on Thursday night time, an edited clip from Fox Business that spliced collectively moments from a 20-minute information convention and emphasised factors the place she had stumbled on her phrases. “PELOSI STAMMERS THROUGH NEWS CONFERENCE,” the president tweeted.

By Friday, the social media giants, already beneath stress to struggle on-line disinformation, had been pressured to reply.

Addressing the distorted video that made Ms. Pelosi’s speech sound slurred, YouTube mentioned the video violated its requirements and had been eliminated. Facebook mentioned third-party truth checker had rated the video “false,” however posts remained on the positioning and the corporate mentioned it was attempting to restrict how broadly the video was shared. That video continued to be shared and seen on Twitter, however the firm declined to remark.

The movies surfaced on-line amid a particularly intense and public feud between Mr. Trump and Ms. Pelosi. Each questioned the other’s temperament and mental fitness in an exchange of personal insults on Thursday, as Ms. Pelosi works to stave off impeachment proceedings that she believes could harm her party and as Mr. Trump continues to defy Democratic efforts to subpoena documents and summon witnesses in the wake of the release of the special counsel’s report last month.

But the videos also raised broader concerns about the roles of digital manipulation and disinformation in politics, particularly in the lead-up to the 2020 election.

Tech giants have been grappling with how to combat disinformation, after Russian interference during the 2016 presidential election became a template for spreading false information online. And recent episodes have underscored how videos and other information can make their way from the corners of the internet to the mantel of national politics.

Mr. Trump has previously used doctored, if obviously cartoonish, videos for political purposes, including ones targeting former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., a Democratic candidate for president, and CNN, the cable news network. In another case, his administration relied on a misleadingly edited video from a contributor to the conspiracy site Infowars to help justify removing the credentials of CNN’s chief White House correspondent.

In another instance, Democratic tech experts mimicked Russian tactics to help Senator Doug Jones of Alabama edge out his Republican opponent, Roy S. Moore, including creating a Facebook page where they posed as conservatives to divide Republicans and endorse a write-in candidate to draw votes away from Mr. Moore.

The origin of the footage that changed Ms. Pelosi’s speech was not clear. In a video posted by C-SPAN, she can be seen speaking at normal speed at a conference for the Center for American Progress.

Siwei Lyu, a professor of computer science at the State University of New York at Albany, said the video boosted low frequencies in the audio, while preserving Ms. Pelosi’s words and appearance, making it especially effective at creating a false impression.

“It’s very subtle,” he said. “I think that is actually one of the most dangerous parts of disinformation and fake media.”

The edited version was shared widely on Facebook and elsewhere, prompting many to question whether Ms. Pelosi had been drinking or had been otherwise under the influence.

An aide to Ms. Pelosi described the attacks as sexist and said the speaker does not drink. Her supporters also raised concerns about the timing of the president’s own tweet sharing the spliced Fox Business video, which came as the video distorting her speech was making the rounds online.

The back-and-forth between Mr. Trump and Ms. Pelosi ensued on Thursday as she suggested that he was too unstable to govern. The president’s theatrical scrapping of Wednesday’s infrastructure meeting at the White House raised questions about his temperament and behavior, she said.

Mr. Trump had “another temper tantrum,” she told reporters at her weekly news conference at the Capitol. “Again, I pray for the president of the United States. I wish that his family or his administration or his staff would have an intervention for the good of the country.”

The president gave her a derogatory nickname, calling her “Crazy Nancy.”

“She’s a mess. She’s lost it,” the president said during an event to announce $16 billion in aid to farmers, in part to compensate for his tariffs policy on China. That event transformed into a monologue and a question-and-answer session with reporters, which included a revival of an old self-assessment that Mr. Trump is an “extremely stable genius.”

Ms. Pelosi quickly shot back on Twitter, saying, “When the ‘extremely stable genius’ starts acting more presidential, I’ll be happy to work with him on infrastructure, trade and other issues.”

In his own tweets on Friday, Mr. Giuliani said he would not apologize for sharing the video.

“Nancy Pelosi wants an apology for a caricature exaggerating her already halting speech pattern,” he wrote, before recalling her comment that Mr. Trump needed an intervention. “First she should withdraw her charge which hurts our entire nation.”

Source link Nytimes.com

Original Source